Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- James Cotton
- Alexander Fore
- Raj Kumar
- Christophe Payan
- Ernesto Rodríguez
- Anuja Sharma
- Bryan Stiles
- Ad Stoffelen
- Anton Verhoef
- Abhisek Chakraborty
- Shweta Sharma
- M. Seemanth
- Maneesha Gupta
- Prantik Chakraborty
- Jalpa Modi
- Tapan Misra
- Neeraj Agarwal
- Rashmi Sharma
- R. Sundar
- R. Venkatesan
- C. Anoopa Prasad
- K. N. Navaneeth
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bhowmick, Suchandra A.
- An Assessment of the Performance of ISRO’s SCATSAT-1 Scatterometer
Abstract Views :296 |
PDF Views:104
Authors
Suchandra A. Bhowmick
1,
James Cotton
2,
Alexander Fore
3,
Raj Kumar
1,
Christophe Payan
4,
Ernesto Rodríguez
3,
Anuja Sharma
1,
Bryan Stiles
3,
Ad Stoffelen
5,
Anton Verhoef
5
Affiliations
1 Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
2 Met Office, GB
3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, US
4 CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, FR
5 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), NL
1 Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
2 Met Office, GB
3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, US
4 CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, FR
5 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), NL
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 6 (2019), Pagination: 959-972Abstract
SCATSAT-1 is a continuity mission for the Oceansat-2 scatterometer, OSCAT-1, which provided useful ocean vector wind observations used in, among others, oceanography, numerical weather prediction (NWP) and nowcasting. The purpose of this paper is to review the findings of the SCATSAT-1 CalVal team regarding the stability and performance of version 1.1.3 of the SCATSAT-1 data. The international CalVal team organized by ISRO included participants from various institutions in India, ISRO’s Space Applications Centre, KNMI from the Netherlands, and from the USA, NOAA, and NASA’s JPL. To perform the evaluation, different centres processed the data independently using heritage processors and made comparisons against NASA’s Ku-band QuikSCAT mission, in situ data, and NWP models. We also provide a preliminary assessment of the impact of the SCATSAT-1 data on operational forecasts in India and Europe. We conclude that the SCATSAT-1 data shows significantly improved performance relative to ISRO’s OSCAT-1 on Oceansat-2, and that the instrument seems to be stable, given the limited period of observation. The CalVal team has also identified features in the data that could benefit from calibration and processing changes, potentially leading to further improvements on data quality.Keywords
Calibration, OSCAT-1, QuikSCAT, Weather Prediction.References
- Fore, A. G., Neumann, G., Freedman, A. P., Chaubell, M. J., Tang, W., Hayashi, A. K. and Yueh, S. H., Aquarius scatterometer calibration. IEEE J.-STARS, 2015, 8(12), 5424–5432.
- Shimada, M., Isoguchi, O. and Isono, K., PALSAR radiometric and geometric calibration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2009, 47(12), 3915–3932.
- Shimada, M., Long-term stability of L-band normalized radar cross section of Amazon rainforest using the JERS-1 SAR. Can. J. Remote Sens., 2005, 31(1), 132–137.
- Madsen, N. M. and Long, D. G., Calibration and validation of the RapidScat scatterometer using tropical rainforests. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2016, 54(5), 2846–2854.
- Jaruwatanadilok, S., Stiles, B. W. and Fore, A. G., Crosscalibration between QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2014, 52(10), 6197–6204.
- Wang, Z., Stoffelen, A., He, Y., Zhang, B., Verhoef, A., Lin, W., Li, X. and Shao, F., An improved wind direction modulation for Ku-band geophysical model functions, based on ASCAT and OSCAT-2 collocations. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, manuscript 2018JC014389 (under review).
- Snyder, J. P., Map projections used by the US Geological Survey, Technical Report Bulletin 1532, USGS 1982.
- Fore, A. G., Stiles, B. W., Chau, A. H., Williams, B. A., Dunbar, R. S. and Rodriguez, E., Point-wise wind retrieval and ambiguity removal improvements for the QuikSCAT climatological data set. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2014, 53(1).
- Ricciardulli, L. and Wentz, F., A scatterometer geophysical model function for climate–quality winds: QuikSCAT Ku-2011. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2015, 32, 1829–1846.
- Stiles, B. W., Pollard, B. D. and Dunbar, R. S., Direction interval retrieval with thresholded nudging: a method for improving the accuracy of QuikSCAT winds. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(1), 79–89.
- EUMETSAT OSI SAF, Product Requirements Document, SAF/OSI/CDOP3/MF/MGT/PL/2-001, 2017.
- EUMETSAT OSI SAF, Service Specification Document, SAF/OSI/CDOP3/MF/MGT/PL/003, 2017.
- EUMETSAT OSI SAF, ScatSat-1 wind Product User Manual, SAF/OSI/CDOP2/KNMI/TEC/MA/287, 2018.
- SCATSAT-1 Data Products and Retrieval Team, Algorithm and Theoretical Basis Document for SCATSAT1 Data Products, ISRO/SAC/SCATSAT1/DP/ATBD/V1.0, Dec 2016.
- Bidlot, J., Holmes, D., Wittmann, P., Lalbeharry, R. and Chen, H., Intercomparison of the performance of operational ocean wave forecasting systems with buoy data. Weather Forecast., 2002, 17, 287–310.
- Liu, W. T., Katsaros, K. B. and Businger, J. A., Bulk parameterization of air-sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints in the interface. J. Atmos. Sci., 1979, 36.
- Stoffelen, A., Toward the true near-surface wind speed: error modeling and calibration using triple collocation. J. Geophys. Res., 1998, 103(C4), 7755–7766; doi:10.1029/97JC03180.
- Vogelzang, J., Stoffelen, A., Verhoef, A. and Figa-Saldana, J., On the quality of high-resolution scatterometer winds. J. Geophys. Res., 2011, 116, C10033; doi:10.1029/2010JC006640.
- Stoffelen, A. et al., Research and Development in Europe on Global Application of the OceanSat-2 Scatterometer Winds, KNMI, Report numbers: NWPSAF-KN-TR-022 and SAF/OSI/CDOP2/KNMI/TEC/RP/1962013, 2013; https://www.nwpsaf.eu/publications/tech_reports/nwpsaf-kn-tr-022.pdf.
- Wang, Z. et al., An SST-dependent Ku-band geophysical model function for RapidScat. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 2017, 122, 3461–3480; doi:10.1002/2016JC012619.
- EUMETSAT OSI SAF, ScatSat-1 wind validation report, SAF/OSI/CDOP3/KNMI/TEC/RP/324, v1.0, 2018.
- Verhoef, A., Vogelzang, J. and Stoffelen, A., Oceansat-2 L2 winds Data Record validation report, SAF/OSI/CDOP3/KNMI/TEC/RP/298.
- Verhoef, A., Vogelzang, J. and Stoffelen, A., Reprocessed SeaWinds L2 winds validation report, SAF/OSI/CDOP2/KNMI/TEC/RP/221.
- Post-Launch Calibration–Validation and Data Quality Evaluation of SCATSAT-1
Abstract Views :259 |
PDF Views:75
Authors
Raj Kumar
1,
Suchandra A. Bhowmick
1,
Abhisek Chakraborty
1,
Anuja Sharma
1,
Shweta Sharma
1,
M. Seemanth
1,
Maneesha Gupta
1,
Prantik Chakraborty
1,
Jalpa Modi
1,
Tapan Misra
1
Affiliations
1 Space Applications Centre, ISRO, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
1 Space Applications Centre, ISRO, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 6 (2019), Pagination: 973-982Abstract
Here we provide a brief description of the post-launch data quality evaluation and calibration–validation chain of the SCATSAT-1, the second scatterometers mission of Indian Space Research Organisation. This chain is of absolute importance to monitor the satellite health and its impact on its measurements. It also provides us overview of the suitability of the data for various applications. The results show that the SCATSAT instrument is having nominal behaviour, the measurements are of very high quality and is comparable to the reference mission QuikSCAT. The ocean surface winds derived using SCATSAT-1 are having errors less than 1 m/s and hence it is suitable for all operational meteorological and oceanographic applications.Keywords
Calibration, Data Quality Evaluation, Scatterometers, Validation, Wind Vectors.References
- Kumar, R., Bhowmick, S. A., Babu, K. N., Nigam, R. and Sarkar, A., Relative calibration of scatterometer backscattering coefficient using natural land targets – a preparatory study for OCEANSAT-2 scatterometer. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(6), 2268–2273.
- Bhowmick, S. A., Kumar, R. and Kiran Kumar, A. S., Crosscalibration of the OceanSAT-2 scatterometer with QuikSCAT scatterometer using natural terrestrial targets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(6), 3393–3398.
- Kumar, R., Chakraborty, A., Parekh, A., Sikhakolli, R., Gohil, B. S. and Kiran Kumar, A. S., Evaluation of Oceansat-2-derived ocean surface winds using observations from global buoys and other scatterometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(5), 2571–2576.
- Chakraborty, A., Deb, S. K., Sikhakolli, R., Gohil, B. S. and Kumar, R., Intercomparison of OSCAT winds with numericalmodelgenerated winds. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett., 2013, 10(2), 260–262.
- Gupta, M., Desai, Y. and Kartikeyan, B., Strategy for quality evaluation of OSCAT data. In Fourth International Conference of Environmental Research, Surat, Gujarat, India, 15–17 December 2011.
- McPhaden, M. J. et al., RAMA: the research moored array for African–Asian–Australian monsoon analysis and prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2009, 90, 459–480.
- Meindl, E. A. and Hamilton, G. D., Programs of the National Data Buoy Center. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1992, 73(7), 985–993.
- Bourles, B. et al., The PIRATA program history, accomplishments and future directions. Cover story. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2008, 89(8), 1111–1125.
- Prasad, V. S. and Indira Rani, S., Data pre-processing for NCMRWF Unified Model (NCUM): Version 2. NCMRWF research report, NMRF/RR/01/2014, 2014; http://www.ncmrwf.gov.in/ncum_obstore_v2.pdf
- De Kloe, J., Stoffelen, A. and Verhoef, A., Improved use of scatterometer measurements by using stress-equivalent reference winds. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth, 2017, 10(5), 2340–2347; doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2685242.
- Cyclone Amphan: Oceanic Conditions Pre- and Post-Cyclone using in situ and Satellite Observations
Abstract Views :170 |
PDF Views:102
Authors
Suchandra A. Bhowmick
1,
Neeraj Agarwal
1,
Rashmi Sharma
1,
R. Sundar
2,
R. Venkatesan
2,
C. Anoopa Prasad
1,
K. N. Navaneeth
1
Affiliations
1 Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
2 National Institute of Ocean Technology, MOES, Chennai 600 100, IN
1 Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Ahmedabad 380 015, IN
2 National Institute of Ocean Technology, MOES, Chennai 600 100, IN